
And with a tsunami of critical cunnilingus, Carey Mulligan was unleashed upon the world.
She’s being hailed as the new Audrey Hepburn. Admittedly, critics love making this kind of rush judgment – Natalie Portman received the exact same accolade, and it’s a claim that holds up. I mean, Hepburn was ever so charming in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, whilst Portman was ever so charming and not annoying in the slightest in Garden State*. Right? …right? – and it’s also a comparison that comes easily, considering one section of the film is a big nod to Hepburn: Mulligan not only dresses in Holly Golighty’s iconic garb, but she embarks upon a holiday in Italy. What’s unusual, though, is how often this comparison is being made, how much the comparison is being pushed by many, many critics. Many reviews have said she deserves a Best Actress Oscar.
Where did she come from?
The thing is, I can provide an answer to that question, because I’m a nerd. Before this international acclaim, Carey Mulligan’s biggest claim to fame was being fellated by Doctor Who nerds in the UK and abroad for playing Sally Sparrow in the popular episode ‘Blink’. I’ve got to admit that I went one further and watched a few other things she was in, including Bleak House, Northanger Abbey, Pride and Prejudice (yes, the Keira Knightley one), and even My Boy Jack, where she plays Daniel Radcliffe’s sister. So whilst she was an intense revelation for the critical community, her performance in An Education just felt like, funnily enough, another in a series of consistently good roles (and bizarrely this happened to me with another star in this film; Sally Hawkins, who I knew from Fingersmith, but the critical community knew afterwards from Happy-Go-Lucky).
The reason I dwell on this is not to express a feeling of being underwhelmed by her, but to note how Mulligan’s sudden propulsion into near-stardom echoes her character’s propulsion into high society. The film is set in 1961 and centres on Jenny, a gorgeous and hyper-intelligent girl who feels held back by her dull parents and her dull school. She’s a hipster intellectual, complete with smoking behind trees, glib statements on life, witty one-liners (“No, it just means you’re a cow”) and a penchant for sleazy French singers. In other words, she’s Liam O’Brien, but sexy.
Jenny’s life changes when she meets Peter Sarsgaard’s David, a man of culture and high status who loves nothing more than attending classical concerts and bidding on artworks at auctions (sorry, orrrctions). His desire to educate her into this new social circle is matched equally by his desire to deflower her. Jenny isn’t an idiot, though. She knows he wants sex. But she’s willing to give it to him, if he continues her education. She’s like a more cultured Lolita.
Nothing about the story is exactly unpredictable, and we can guess beforehand that
*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*
Jenny isn’t David’s first conquered goods, and that Jenny will end up realising that her parents and teacher, stagnant as they may occasionally be (though charming), really do want the best for her and shouldn’t be completely ignored
*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*
but what makes this film so excellent is how well its themes intertwine; Jenny’s education at the hands of her parents, her teacher, David, and ultimately herself. The film never loses sight of any of this, confidently juggling all of these elements. Its script is flawless, and not a single scene or line seems superfluous. We learn as much about Jenny from small moments – her excitable, nervous, stream-of-conscious apologetic gabbling when asked when she’s speaking French by Rosamund Pike’s Helen (Pike is excellent too, incidentally, and it’s funny how they effectively become their respective Bennett characters for this one scene) – as we do from dialogue-less montages such as her holiday with David to learn Italian for beginners.
Speaking of which! This is directed by Lone Scherfig, one of the original Dogme 95 directors who has used the movement as a platform to launch their careers (as opposed to someone like Thomas Vinterberg, who directed one standout Dogme film and then ruined his career thereafter). Like Mulligan, it feels as if she’s got an ever-rising future ahead of her. Oh, and while I’m at it, everyone else in this is pitch perfect too, especially Alfred Molina, and I’m unsure of why Sarsgaard’s icily charming performance has been criticised – hasn’t Edward Cullen proven that this mood is exactly what attracts teenagers**?
In the end, though, you’ll be seeing this film for Carey Mulligan. And see this film you really, really should.
Rating: 




I realise that my constant “fellating” metaphor may be a bit unsettling (and inaccurate at points, but there’s no verb for cunnilingus : ( ), but I decided that since the film effectively involves Jenny’s sexual awakening, it could be a metaphor for Mulligan’s awakening into the world of acting. Either that, or it’s just an image that really, really appeals to me. Take your pick.
I should also mention that there’s been a minor controversy about this film apparently having the message of “Beware of Jews bearing flowers”. Considering we’re supposed to hate the character’s stupid anti-Semitic statements (such as in the “Jesus wasn’t a Jew.” “Is that what he told you?” scene), I don’t agree at all with this, but it’s interesting to read regardless.
*Speaking of which, Peter Sarsgaard was in that film too. That tarnishes him far more than anything his character does in An Education.
**I’m being facetious, please don’t hurt me.









