Archive for the ‘Reviews’ Category

An Education

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

an-education1
And with a tsunami of critical cunnilingus, Carey Mulligan was unleashed upon the world.

She’s being hailed as the new Audrey Hepburn. Admittedly, critics love making this kind of rush judgment – Natalie Portman received the exact same accolade, and it’s a claim that holds up. I mean, Hepburn was ever so charming in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, whilst Portman was ever so charming and not annoying in the slightest in Garden State*. Right? …right? – and it’s also a comparison that comes easily, considering one section of the film is a big nod to Hepburn: Mulligan not only dresses in Holly Golighty’s iconic garb, but she embarks upon a holiday in Italy. What’s unusual, though, is how often this comparison is being made, how much the comparison is being pushed by many, many critics. Many reviews have said she deserves a Best Actress Oscar.

Where did she come from?

The thing is, I can provide an answer to that question, because I’m a nerd. Before this international acclaim, Carey Mulligan’s biggest claim to fame was being fellated by Doctor Who nerds in the UK and abroad for playing Sally Sparrow in the popular episode ‘Blink’. I’ve got to admit that I went one further and watched a few other things she was in, including Bleak House, Northanger Abbey, Pride and Prejudice (yes, the Keira Knightley one), and even My Boy Jack, where she plays Daniel Radcliffe’s sister. So whilst she was an intense revelation for the critical community, her performance in An Education just felt like, funnily enough, another in a series of consistently good roles (and bizarrely this happened to me with another star in this film; Sally Hawkins, who I knew from Fingersmith, but the critical community knew afterwards from Happy-Go-Lucky).

The reason I dwell on this is not to express a feeling of being underwhelmed by her, but to note how Mulligan’s sudden propulsion into near-stardom echoes her character’s propulsion into high society. The film is set in 1961 and centres on Jenny, a gorgeous and hyper-intelligent girl who feels held back by her dull parents and her dull school. She’s a hipster intellectual, complete with smoking behind trees, glib statements on life, witty one-liners (“No, it just means you’re a cow”) and a penchant for sleazy French singers. In other words, she’s Liam O’Brien, but sexy.

Jenny’s life changes when she meets Peter Sarsgaard’s David, a man of culture and high status who loves nothing more than attending classical concerts and bidding on artworks at auctions (sorry, orrrctions). His desire to educate her into this new social circle is matched equally by his desire to deflower her. Jenny isn’t an idiot, though. She knows he wants sex. But she’s willing to give it to him, if he continues her education. She’s like a more cultured Lolita.

Nothing about the story is exactly unpredictable, and we can guess beforehand that

*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*
Jenny isn’t David’s first conquered goods, and that Jenny will end up realising that her parents and teacher, stagnant as they may occasionally be (though charming), really do want the best for her and shouldn’t be completely ignored
*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*SPOILERS*

but what makes this film so excellent is how well its themes intertwine; Jenny’s education at the hands of her parents, her teacher, David, and ultimately herself. The film never loses sight of any of this, confidently juggling all of these elements. Its script is flawless, and not a single scene or line seems superfluous. We learn as much about Jenny from small moments – her excitable, nervous, stream-of-conscious apologetic gabbling when asked when she’s speaking French by Rosamund Pike’s Helen (Pike is excellent too, incidentally, and it’s funny how they effectively become their respective Bennett characters for this one scene) – as we do from dialogue-less montages such as her holiday with David to learn Italian for beginners.

Speaking of which! This is directed by Lone Scherfig, one of the original Dogme 95 directors who has used the movement as a platform to launch their careers (as opposed to someone like Thomas Vinterberg, who directed one standout Dogme film and then ruined his career thereafter). Like Mulligan, it feels as if she’s got an ever-rising future ahead of her. Oh, and while I’m at it, everyone else in this is pitch perfect too, especially Alfred Molina, and I’m unsure of why Sarsgaard’s icily charming performance has been criticised – hasn’t Edward Cullen proven that this mood is exactly what attracts teenagers**?

In the end, though, you’ll be seeing this film for Carey Mulligan. And see this film you really, really should.

Rating: ★★★★☆

I realise that my constant “fellating” metaphor may be a bit unsettling (and inaccurate at points, but there’s no verb for cunnilingus : ( ), but I decided that since the film effectively involves Jenny’s sexual awakening, it could be a metaphor for Mulligan’s awakening into the world of acting. Either that, or it’s just an image that really, really appeals to me. Take your pick.

I should also mention that there’s been a minor controversy about this film apparently having the message of “Beware of Jews bearing flowers”. Considering we’re supposed to hate the character’s stupid anti-Semitic statements (such as in the “Jesus wasn’t a Jew.” “Is that what he told you?” scene), I don’t agree at all with this, but it’s interesting to read regardless.

*Speaking of which, Peter Sarsgaard was in that film too. That tarnishes him far more than anything his character does in An Education.

**I’m being facetious, please don’t hurt me.

Where the Wild Things Are

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

where_the_wild_things_are_movie_image_max_records_as_max

As one of the potentially-millions of children that read Where the Wild Things Are as a youth, learning of the upcoming release of this film – and of Spike Jonze’s attachment to the project – certainly piqued my interest. Where the Wild Things Are was, to me, one of the forgotten books of my childhood; I only remembered it when it was mentioned. All I remembered, when I thought about the plot, was a child becoming a king over some wild things. Searching on the net, I realised that, lo and behold, that was the entire plot. How on earth could this be fleshed out for a feature length?

I think what’s really admirable about this adaptation is its refusal to massively complicate the plot in the slightest. Instead of constructing an all-new backstory to the world of the wild things or anything similar, Jonze’s only complication is to make most of the wild things represent someone in Max’s real world; G.W. as his sister, Judith as his mother (she even looks like Catherine Keener), Ira as his mother’s boyfriend, and Carol as, well, him. This is effectively an extrapolation from the book, where the wild things represented Max’s wild side. The wild things are completely and utterly childish, charming but mindlessly destructive. They construct a fort to keep outsiders away (even though there aren’t really any outsiders) with secret entrances and then sabotage it, they throw dirt clods at each other, etc. It’s startling how easily Jonze recreates childhood here. I remember people complaining and saying “I QUIT” during war games, and being deliberately pelted for this. I remember enjoying tackling people, but being terrified when group tackled and suffering from minor claustrophobia. Admittedly, I don’t remember being terrified of the sun dying, but I’m sure Woody Allen does.

So what we have here is a film without any real plot. Good. Plot’s overrated, in my opinion. I’ve said before (see; my Transformers editorial) that I think summer blockbusters should probably attempt to communicate visuals and feelings and effectively eradicate plot as much as possible. As Carol would say, “Hey, this film gets it”. Earlier this year, I reviewed Up, and noted that the last half of the film wasn’t as strong as the first; it was, in fact, when the plot kicked in that things went a little awry. Where the Wild Things Are is a film about relationships, where all of its drama comes from the kind of spats children usually throw, where all of its excitement comes from pointless games that the wild things play.

The intriguing thing is that we know from the start the lesson that Max is going to learn (as the wild things also do). What sustains the film isn’t the lesson itself necessarily, but how they get there. It’s arguably a film that may be too dark for children, and certainly it can be terrifying (especially, as a fellow moviegoer pointed out, how Carol’s verbal spats are even more frightening when you realise he’s John damned Soprano), but it’s possibly an experience that would still benefit a child. I mean, Time Bandits ends with

*SPOILER*SPOILER*SPOILER*SPOILER*thehouseexplodingandhisparentsdying*SPOILER*SPOILER*

so I’m not sure how damaging this kind of film could be.

Either way, it’s a very cleverly constructed movie.

Rating: ★★★★☆

(I managed to work the title of previous Spike Jonze films into this review. I am ever so cool)

The White Ribbon

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

The-White-Ribbon-Das-weis

One of my problems is that I’m prone to listening to hype and letting it build and multiply in my head. I blow all this hype up to proportions so massive that virtually nothing lives up to it. When a trailer emerges, I literally watch it hundreds of times, mulling over the details like a deep meditation. I avoid reviews like the plague for fear of spoilers, but out of a craving for information I have to fight the urge to go on Rotten Tomatoes and read every single critical review. Q&A sessions, IMDB user reviews… it just escalates until the point where the film is destined to disappoint. Considering my recent Haneke-fest I thought I’d be overhyping The White Ribbon, desperately seeking an untouchable, unquestionable masterpiece, but to be perfectly honest it was exactly as I imagined it’d be: freakin’ phenomenal.

I got into Michael Haneke’s work this year. Around the time I saw The White Ribbon I’d just completed his filmography (not including the Funny Games remake and his two television films) and Hidden had become one of my favourite films. So you can perhaps understand what I was going through when I say I convulsed during the opening credits. It might seem a bit strange, as the film’s credits consist of a black screen, no accompanying music and a small, white set of credits (not to mention that he’s used these same credits before in Code Unknown, Time of the Wolf and possibly The Piano Teacher, my memory fails me), but goddamnit, there was something indescribably epic about those silent, minimalistic credits. Then, with bated breath, the film began.

The White Ribbon takes place in a pre-WWI German village where a series of crimes occur. A doctor is injured while riding his horse; several children go missing and then are discovered, tortured and abused; there are acts of unexplained violence towards animals, and a whole other string of strange occurences. The children are brought up under strict discipline and religious dogma, and after one of the children confronts his father – a priest about a sin he has committed, he is forced to wear a white ribbon in public as a reminder to himself and to others of the concept of purity and innocence, and the importance of retaining this innocence for the good of the future.

I can say that The White Ribbon has been the most emotionally distressing film I’ve seen since Lars von Trier’s Breaking the Waves, which I saw two years ago, a film that moved me so much I swear I cried out at least a quarter of my bodily fluids. It is especially sad, bearing in mind what Haneke said about the children being destined to become the seeds of Nazism. In typical Haneke fashion, the film is a psychological headache; the characters never seem to have clear motives for their actions, whether it be killing a little boy’s recovering parrot or suicidily balancing on a bridge’s rungs, the actions (and sometimes crimes) aren’t pre-meditated or even meditated, they just occur as naturally as cleaning your teeth or having a shower; purely run on an instinct twisted and torn from years of destructive, abusive discipline. The scene with the girl and the parrot is particularly perplexing as she doesn’t even seem consciously aware of her actions. It’s as if she’s hypnotised.

Although in the past his characters have been highly and disturbingly realistic, especially the more psychologically unsound characters, Haneke achieves something very rare for him in this film: a real human connection with the characters. There’s a touching, heartfelt romance between two of them, the School Teacher and Eva. Now that’s something I never thought I’d see in a Haneke movie, humanity portrayed in a positive, hopeful light. There were fleeting moments of this in Time of the Wolf but nowhere near as prominently.

The cinematography in this is just too beautiful for words. Shot originally in colour and in a HD digital format, it has been colour graded to black and white to fit in with the time period. The low-key, almost pitch black interior shots are incredibly haunting and constantly filled me with a sense of unease and fear. And speaking of digitally altered images… does anyone else find it strange that Haneke used a CGI horse instead of a real one, considering his track record? Fish flailing to death in The Seventh Continent, a tazered pig in Benny’s Video, a dog beaten with golf clubs in Funny Games, a horse shot dead in Time of the Wolf, a beheaded chicken in Hidden; it all seems very weird that Haneke would have a moral crisis going as far as replacing his flesh and blood animals with some delicately rendered ones. Perhaps that’s just the direction he’s heading in, making films for a new audience. Apart from the recent Funny Games remake, this is probably Haneke’s most accessible film.

The White Ribbon is by an indescribably long shot my favourite movie of 2009, and will certainly make my decade list. Go out of your way to see this.

Rating: ★★★★★

The White Ribbon has won the Palme d’Or at this year’s Cannes Film Festival.

You can find more Haneke Haneke-nisms here:

http://www.projectorheads.com/2009/10/haneke-haneke-haneke-and-more-haneke/

Fantastic Mr. Fox

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Fantastic Mr. Fox Review:

Rocket Man

Monday, October 5th, 2009

rocketman

I’ll start off by saying that this is hands down the greatest Australian film to come out in years, possibly ever, and that is seriously saying something considering the recent string of great films like Samson and Delilah, Balibo, The Last Ride, Van Diemen’s Land, Beautiful Kate, The Black Balloon, I Know How Many Runs You Scored Last Summer, The Man from Hong Kong and Harvie Krumpet. Margaret Pomeranz never saw this movie, neither did David Stratton, but I can assure that they would weep openly at this visceral, intellectual delight. Even Tarantino had to concede that Rocket Man was the best Australian film since Turkey Shoot. Tim Kurschner is our generation’s Lisa McCune; he is a delightful young talent whose performance will certainly be remembered in years to come. I have faith in The Muscles’ future. He is truly a sight to behold.

Rating: ★★★★★